A few important confirmations so we stay perfectly aligned going forward:
• This material does overlap with earlier filings (petition for review, appellate discussion, plagiarism theory), but it is not redundant—it advances the argument with appellate framing, judicial conduct, and evidentiary theory
• The pen-name issue, Library of Congress correspondence, and copyright registration context are now clearly part of the procedural spine
• The subconscious copyright doctrine citation (Sheldon v. MGM) is a strong doctrinal anchor and should be emphasized later, as you noted